Living for Others
Ayn Rand’s descriptions and obvious
opinions of Peter Keating and the way that he lives his life forced me to
examine the way that I live and the way that I have been told that I should
live. From a young age, my parents and teachers
have stressed the importance of service and living for others, using everything
that I am given and all of my talents to help those who are not as privileged
as I am. Rand, however, seems to
completely disagree with this notion, making depicting Keating as weak and incompetent
for his eagerness to please others. Where is the line between wanting to make
others happy and basing success on other’s happiness, which we inevitably can’t
control?
I believe that there is a way to
strive to please others and to dedicate your life to service without losing
sight of your separate goals and values.
But I think this also ties in nicely to our discussion a couple of weeks
ago about what we are to do when those around us just want us to be happy. On what are we supposed to base this
happiness? I have a hard time believing
that wanting to please others with my life means that I lack drive and
direction, or competence as Rand goes as far as to say. It’s necessary, I think, to not use this
desire for service as an excuse not to make decisions for yourself, as Keating
does, but I think it is possible to want to live to please others while having
separate goals and ideas of success that are based on yourself and what you can
achieve.
-Bridget
Comments
Post a Comment